Distributed fibre-optic sensing (DAS/DTS)

Field Instrumentation Industry Acceptance Near-term · 2–5 yrs Evidence E4 · Multi-site references

A single optical fibre turned into thousands of measurement points along a pipeline, well, cable or perimeter. Temperature sensing is long established; acoustic sensing for leak and intrusion detection is in production, but its performance depends heavily on installation and signal interpretation.

EMERGINGPROMISEREALITYACCEPTANCEPROVEN
Distributed fibre-optic sensing (DAS/DTS) is placed at the Industry Acceptance stage, with an estimated time to proven use of 2–5 yrs (near-term) and evidence level E4, multi-site references. Stage reflects attention versus results; the evidence level reflects deployment proof. The height of the curve is illustrative only. October 2026 edition.

How a fibre becomes a sensor

An interrogator at one end of the fibre sends laser pulses and analyses the tiny fraction of light scattered back from every point along it. Because the speed of light in the fibre is known, the time of arrival tells the interrogator where along the cable each signal came from, typically resolved to a few metres over many kilometres.

Different scattering effects measure different things. Raman scattering varies with temperature and is the basis of distributed temperature sensing (DTS). Brillouin scattering responds to temperature and strain and is used for distributed strain sensing (DSS), for example to detect ground movement. Rayleigh scattering, analysed coherently, responds to minute vibrations and is the basis of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), which effectively turns the fibre into a long line of microphones.

The three main distributed fibre-optic techniques
TechniquePhysical effectMeasuresTypical industrial uses
DTSRaman backscatterTemperaturePower-cable hotspots, fire detection, well profiles, liquid leaks with thermal signature
DSSBrillouin backscatterStrain (and temperature)Ground movement, pipeline and dam deformation
DASRayleigh backscatterVibration and soundThird-party intrusion, gas and liquid leaks, flow and pig tracking

Where it is used

Power transmission is a well-documented example. France's transmission system operator RTE uses combined DAS and DTS on about 39 km of a 225 kV underground cable link to detect third-party intrusion and cable faults and to locate hotspots; the project team also simulated nearby agricultural activity such as soil mixing and harvesting to reduce false alarms 1. That last detail illustrates the central practical issue with DAS: the fibre hears everything, and the value lies in telling a real threat from a tractor.

Pipelines are the other main market, for leak detection, intrusion detection and integrity monitoring. Industry practitioners point out that DTS and DAS are the main options for leak detection, that the right choice depends on many variables, including product, pressure, burial and cable position, and that deploying both together is ideal but often ruled out by cost 2. Downhole, DTS and DAS are used in oil and gas wells for flow profiling and monitoring.

What controls performance

The research literature is a useful corrective to supplier brochures. In controlled tests at the Colorado School of Mines, reported in October 2025, DAS detected simulated leaks of a quarter-inch to one inch on a short steel test pipeline, with stronger signals for larger leaks, higher flow velocities and cables closer to the leak. Cable type and attachment made a large difference: lighter, flexible cables gave the clearest signatures, a thick cable showed limited sensitivity, and better taping improved an externally mounted cable 3. These were laboratory tests, not field results, and the authors identified machine learning to separate leak signatures from normal operating noise as future work 3.

The practical lessons for owners follow directly. Where the fibre sits relative to the pipe, how it is coupled to it, and how the signal processing is tuned to the specific route matter as much as the interrogator. A fibre laid for telecommunications in the same trench may be usable, but its sensitivity to leaks on the pipe will differ from a cable designed and placed for sensing.

Fitting it into operations

Evidence timeline

  1. Nov 2021RTE deploys combined DAS and DTS on about 39 km of a 225 kV underground cable link. 1
  2. Apr 2024Pipeline Technology Conference paper: DAS and DTS are the main fibre options for leak detection; suitability depends on many variables. 2
  3. Oct 2025Colorado School of Mines laboratory tests show DAS leak detection depends strongly on cable type and coupling. 3

Why it sits at the Industry Acceptance stage

Distributed temperature sensing is long established, and combined DAS/DTS systems are in production with several owners and suppliers across power and pipelines, which supports evidence level E4 and placement at the Industry Acceptance stage.

We keep the entry at Industry Acceptance rather than Proven in Use because DAS leak detection performance is still highly installation-specific, independent field performance data is limited, and false-alarm management remains a significant operating burden.

Adoption signals to watch

Questions to ask before committing

Terms used on this page

DAS
Distributed acoustic sensing, based on Rayleigh backscatter.
DTS
Distributed temperature sensing, based on Raman backscatter.
Interrogator
The opto-electronic unit that launches the light and analyses what returns.

Sources

  1. Power cable monitoring solution to French electricity transmission system operator AP Sensing, Nov 2021
  2. DFOS: what type of fiber optic sensing is most appropriate for leak detection on my pipeline? Pipeline Technology Conference, Apr 2024
  3. A practical distributed acoustic sensing approach for gas-pipeline-leak detection Journal of Petroleum Technology, Oct 2025

Related technologies

See this entry on the full maturity map · All Instrumentation entries · How placements are made. Stage and time-horizon placements are editorial judgements based on the public sources listed above, as of October 2026. They are not engineering, safety or investment advice; see the Terms of Use.